Being a completist by nature, I do like to watch a film from
start to finish, no matter how awful, just in case – against the odds – there is
an upturn in the quality and something altogether spectacular happens. Altaa wanted to walk out of Watchmen because of the stomach-churning,
bone-cracking brutality before our eyes and insistently blasted onto us by the
multiplex’s speakers, but I made her persevere (as well as myself) and was
rewarded with a semi-decent end scene.
On TV, one can finish a film though not necessarily catch
the start when channel surfing. This can
be a negative, robbing you of vital plot point but with easy-going movie-making
it is not such a disaster. Two films I
have seen this week would fall into this category.
The Ugly Truth
starring Gerard Butler and Katherine Heigl was pilloried by critics. I, however, was left of the mind of Spielberg’s
words that it is harsh to criticise a motion picture when a lot of people have
put a lot of work into making it a reality.
Sure, The Ugly Truth isn’t
going to change the face of cinema, yet there is a place for undemanding fare
too. Maybe, I have a soft spot for these
romcoms, having liked the critical failures How
to Lose a Guy in 10 Days and (to a lesser extent) Sweet Home Alabama (Fred Ward and Reese Witherspoon being significant
compensations in the latter). It leaves
me - fearfully - wondering if, should I ever catch them, I would enjoy Mamma Mia or This is War. On balance, I
think I would (the ABBA musical was a runaway silver screen success). The
Ugly Truth finally showcased to my own eyes the talents of Butler and, as a
laidback stud, there’s probably a lot of his own life on which he can fall back. I can certainly see why he’s a hit with the
ladies. Heigl was kooky and funny, even
if her transformation was a little fast-paced.
The story rattled along most agreeably, raising more than a few laughs
and even with a few bold politically incorrect statements (well, bold for
mainstream Hollywood) thrown in to the mix.
I suppose the ending was sign-posted (though not in neon lights) and it
did try to throw you off the trail until the last ten or so minutes. The sex scene was cleverly muted to lower the
ratings and the one F-word allowed for a 12A was well worked in to the plot
too. It did fall down on realism in the
denouement, for if a woman is given the apparent brush-off in her first choice
of man, she will not dump her second choice, especially if the latter is
unaware of her exchange with the former – people mend and make do. Casablanca encapsulates this truism
perfectly. So, yes, The Ugly Truth was crude but it did the business of being a relaxing
ride. Three out of five.
Babylon A.D. fell into the same category in that I missed a
bit of the start, though, as with The
Ugly Truth, not by much. Set in some
miserable future, it’s a road trip in which the gruff Vin Diesel with bond with
his charges Michelle Yeoh and Mélanie Thierry. As America is untouched, we can assume the
post-apocalyptic landscapes are a result of a Sino-Russian or a Russian civil
war, though curiously Vladivostok seems untouched. Characterisation is sketch-like at best and the
focus is on a few okay-ish action scenes, the kind where the villains expend
thousands of rounds of ammunition but the hero needs just one bullet to take
down each opponent. Despite the numerous
grim futuristic scenes and a Gotham City-like New York (but of course), it
reminded me of Conan the Barbarian’s quests. It’s a bit like a feature-length Lady Gaga
music video though possessing less panache and worse songs. It really falls apart in the last half-hour,
as the plot descends into incoherence.
The final chase scene is, risibly and obviously, on a race test
track. And a vast corporation can only
sum up four landcruisers to chase the heroes and then loses all trace of them
for years, while Diesel inconspicuously builds a picture-perfect country
home. There is virtually no rhyme or
reason to any of this conclusion. Given
the villains, headed by Charlotte Rampling (there are related and unrelated
cameos from Gerard Dépardieu and Mark Strong), are in the process of trying to
create a new religion, it could be a pop at Scientology, though dressed up and
hollowed out so as to not offend the powerful Hollywood adherents. In addition to some of the early set pieces,
there are some striking scenes over what one can be positive, such as a
haunting, nuclear-bombed city (as they are travelling east by rail to
Vladivostok, I would say Khabarovsk, though geography is best glossed over here)
and a Russian submarine breaking through the ice as part of an immigrant
run. The confused, stupid ending
(seeming to act as trailer for a forthcoming sequel that never saw the light of
day) spoiled what was no more than a clunky and average movie anyway. 1.5 out
of five.