Thursday, May 22, 2008

One more

One last blog before I get married and go on my honeymoon. I have more topics but simply not enough time.
Jarvis Cocker, one of the most articulate musicians currently in the business, put in a largely monosyllabic performance on Newsnight Review last Friday. i only watched it because of him. Things were either 'bad' or 'quite poor'; or they were until he got to reviewing the new album. Here he was in his element where he waxed lyrical as he berated all the 'filler' on it. All this very much in opposition to the other guest reviewers (not that that should be a bad thing). He also criticised the publication of lyrics on the sleeve jacket. Kirsty Wark lured out of him whether he though song lyrics should never be published - as I watched intently - and he agreed! I was thinking how he could say such a thing when the song lyrics are published on the jacket of Pulp's breakthrough album Different Class. Maybe the rest of the band overruled him on that occasion.

Indiana Jones is released tomorrow, where he defends Damien Hirst's Crystal Skull; well diamond-encrusted skull but you can fool most of a Hollywood blockbuster with cheap glass baubles. Pre-World War II, Dr Jones often said of relics "It belongs in a museum. Now in right-wing 1950s America, fighting the Soviets, Indiana's refrain will no doubt be "It belongs in a private collection." Times change.

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Catch-up 2

And here is the second one from last year. The Harry Potter review was roughly 500 words. This one, of The Bourne Ultimatum, is 1,500 words, displaying versatility in writing-up.

The Bourne Ultimatum

Four Stars out of Five
The summer of sequels continues with the Matt Damon action-adventure vehicle the Bourne Ultimatum, the third in the series, hoping to join the gravy train. Paul Greengrass, fresh from missing out on best director Oscar for United 93 thanks to Martin’s Scorcese’s Lifetime Achievement Award, is back in the director’s chair for a second dosage of what is referred to as the antidote to 007.
Jason Bourne is the agent on the loose whose mind was scrubbed, but after a trauma, he would like to have a bit more colour instead of it being whiter then white. His erstwhile employers in US intelligence seek to blank out his life in addition to his memory. Ultimately, Bourne ensures that their training of him rebounds on them. It’s a set-up that’s worked well so far, but how far can you stretch a winning sequence?
Once again, trouble finds the isolated but far from hapless Bourne rather than vice versa. This time it’s a leak to the media that sends the Central Intelligence Agency into a frenzy. This leak regards the moral outrage around which the film rotates, namely that the CIA has reduced itself to the hi-tech equivalent of a two-bit Central American death squad. The War on Terror is the conflict that dare not speak its name. Following the loosening of checks and balances by the top men in Washington, all ‘black-ops’ have been rolled into one seriously badass department where anything is permissible, even execution, as if the CIA has never sanctioned assassinations before.
Greengrass has made clear to the public his critical posture to the use of torture and the euphemistically entitled extraordinary rendition. We get to see a fair bit of water-boarding, which frankly does the cause of those who seek its abolition no good, since it looks like an upmarket way of someone having their head dunked in a toilet. For a movie constantly on the move, it doesn’t choose to rachet up the tension via continuously watching someone’s head being held under water for five minutes or more or place the emotional stress of believing you’re going to drown. As for sleep deprivation, I’ve seen people in a worse state after a midnight movie marathon. For these techniques and others to be discussed in a matter-of-fact way in a moral free environment within the hidden recesses of big government, is a little too obvious in its manipulation in favour of the director’s liberal sensibilities. This is not the film to be dealing with such pieties; let’s get on with the action.
An awful lot of free promotion takes place - sometimes laughably, it’s so in your face - for the favourite newspaper of regular Guardian reader Greengrass; in fact, there’s more general product placement than Bond. Forget Bourne being the anti-JB - he’s the über-JB!
There’s also more than a few escapades that Britain’s most famous spy could relate to. A chase across the rooftops of Tangiers is reminiscent of The Living Daylights and also driving a car off the top of a multi-storey car park á là Tomorrow Never Dies, though Bourne is hard enough to stay in the car while he’s doing it. When Bourne nicks a police car in New York, it enters the realm of Grand Theft Auto, which is so much more than a game. But there’s one film it really bears close comparison with. Shaky camerawork, tick. Man on the run from a government conspiracy, tick. If bad guys were to be any more wired the only language they would be speaking is binary, er, tick. Yes, it’s Tony Scott’s Enemy of the State. Maligned by high-minded critics, it may not have the travel brochure of the Bourne trilogy, but it packs a punch. Ridley’s little brother though has not been the toast of Hollywood since he directed the Tarantino-scripted True Romance. Greengrass claims to be allowed to do whatever he wants. His is the star in the ascendancy. And so he is allowed to follow his agenda that would like you to believe that whenever you hear of a bombing in the Middle East, don’t dismiss out of hand that its origins may have been closer to home.
On the fleshing out of the plotline, Damon does a reasonable job of the driven rogue agent and man of few words, though I do prefer the turn given by the marionette in Team America: World Police. The acting journey taken by Julia Stiles since Save the Last Dance has not been a long one, with her here resembling old oak floorboards, in a performance creaking throughout. Stiles’ expressions are of the stop-action motion picture halted after one take with a constantly concerned look branded on her face, unless it was method acting for the support role in a Mr Sheen advert. As Stiles is a stalwart from the first film, Greengrass (who was not on board then), truly lumbered with her, would be fully justified as a workman blaming his tools and demanding a refund from the timber mill.
As for the other prominent thesps, Joan Allen has kept herself in great shape and just about manages to convince as the conscience of the CIA. David Strathairn laps up his role as the smooth, debonair senior operator who has shunted his conscience into early retirement. It is to his profit that the role assigned was more plausible than the one Allen had to work with. Albert Finney is, as ever, Albert Finney in that you don’t think of his character as ‘Albert Finney playing someone’. Stiles, take note.
There are plenty of scrapes down side alleys on all manner of vehicles and virtuoso fight scenes that leave you gasping for air, but in trying to top all this, the quick-cutting car chase in NYC gets a bit confusing - so he smashed into who; is he going backwards, forwards or sideways? If only all of us were possessed of Bourne’s super-efficient brain. The style Greengrass adopts obviously has the blessing of executive producer Doug Liman (at the directorial helm of The Bourne Identity) as it did with The Bourne Supremacy.
The ingenuity of Bourne is again to the fore. In Supremacy, he stuffed a rolled-up magazine into a toaster, knocked on the gas and so as he left while the enemy agents entered, the house blew up. Nothing so explosive on Bourne’s part here but he does do something clever with an electric fan and a flashlight. There is sophistication in plot development as well, with a superbly smart converging of the timelines of The Bourne Supremacy and The Bourne Ultimatum. Try and catch Supremacy before watching Ultimatum and you’ll see what I mean (and probably have a better understanding too).
I liked it when Bourne told the wet Guardian journalist Simon Ross played by actual freelancer Paddy Considine that “This is real life, not a news story!” Though that could be read two ways, the film demonstrates it with an implied scepticism that you do not find real life in the pages of newspapers. I bet Considine’s character wishes he had accepted that Iraq posting now. Flashbacks are a notoriously difficult concept to insert without self-parody into a film but Greengrass handles their intrusion tastefully here. The only moment when alarm bells were ringing in my head rather than in the film, was the existential angst felt by a CIA ‘asset’ (a sort-of Bourne Mk II) that Bourne had spared. It threatened the credibility of the fabric of reality the film had built up but luckily was over soon. Such themes, a digression on the writers’ parts, are not the preserve of such a film since they cannot be given the justice of proper exploration.
Inevitably in such a fast-paced film, there are going to be some holes and slip-ups that the editors and producers missed. For me, a cardinal one in Supremacy was that Bourne was a Russian linguist and cultural expert, yet in Moscow he got into a licensed cab which can be easily tracked (and anyway they overcharge you), when any person who knows even a smidgen about Russia would hail a civilian car to take you to your destination. The speed about which Ultimatum progresses means you might not notice it at the time, but on reflection seem quite glaring, such as neighbours not waking up nor dogs roused at the first clatter of gunfire, but doing so when Bourne intentionally lets off a few rounds of his own. Allied to the grievous display of product promotion and the equally, if not more so, grievous display of Stiles, it’s these niggles that bring it down to very good from five star.
Ultimatum extensively ties in with its two ‘predecessors’. This gives it a pleasing finality that Paul Greengrass can look back on with satisfaction. As his modus operandi is to alternate between high-powered drama and high-powered action, it will be fascinating to watch him choose his projects to maintain the balancing act that has produced such exalted expectations, with Alexander Payne his closest competitor in his age range. With the Bourne films behind him, what turbo-charged film has Greengrass his eye on for two years hence? James Bond, anyone?

Catch-up

Following on from last night, here are two more pieces that have been sitting on my system for far too long. The first is a review of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

3 STARS
It’s that time of year again. The sun is shining. The children are frolicking in their summer freedom. Bums are numbed by the length of the latest Harry Potter release.
To be fair, HPATOOTP isn’t as long as some of its predecessors or its rivals this year. The series is, however, slipping into formula. A new teacher is needed for Defence Against the Dark Arts again, another of Harry’s friends dies (with a certain headmaster’s extinction well signposted for the next instalment), once more a climatic confrontation leaves Potter and his archenemy at square one. What’s changed? Harry Potter is a year older.
This is not to disparage its entertainment value; after all, soap operas are past masters at repeating themselves. It’s just that, like soap operas, you could miss an episode - sorry, film - but still catch up with the action next year. It fails to escape the inherent trouble with sequels, that of creating standalone movies for newcomers while still capturing the interest of the devotees who were there at the beginning.
The acting is what you might expect. Daniel Radcliffe continues to mature into the lead role and there are plenty of old hands playing the adult support roles that know how not to disappoint, giving the comedic moments space to breathe while not undermining the serious scenes (especially Robbie Coltrane). One of the henchwomen (Helena Bonham Carter), a tad unkempt, looks like Amy Winehouse - obviously the rehab failed (try The Priory next time instead of Azkaban, luv).
There are some sweet topical jabs. Government interference in schools leading to children being examined into ennui by interminable tests; a minister blinkered to an ongoing, unfurling crisis (can’t think what that might be about). Maybe it’s going too far in believing the new teacher (Imelda Staunton) is akin to Tony Blair. As nice as pie at first, but possessing a vicious streak, denouncing and acting illegally against those who oppose his, er, her control freakery and the myriad new, draconian decrees this traditional curtain twitcher introduces. She is a tyrant in pink as she goes around imposing her totalitarian system. However, her bellowing insistence on “order” is more the ordure of cliché. There’s also a swipe at journalism through the Daily Prophet (profit, geddit?), a rag of the lowest order, though curious it should operate a monopoly in an information market.
Talking of episodes, the action in HPATOOTP has plenty of similarity with the Star Wars series - making the choice between good and evil, all that magic lightning, references to “old man”, friends warning of “a trap” - with a dash of Lord of the Rings thrown in. And this illuminates another problem. In the rage for New Age and a host of sword and/or sorcery films upcoming, time has found out the Harry Potter franchise with the blurring between imitated and imitator. Harry Potter will have to up his game if the final two chapters are to be distinguished above its competitors.

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Horror story

As Doctor Who episode aired tonight has shown a winged beastie at the centrepiece of its plot, I feel I should commit to weblog something which i had written back in November. The story is complete and it has an explanation of its inspiration at the end, which has remained unchanged since I wrote it last year. Here it is.

The beginning (By Anthony Horowitz)
I always used to think that horror was something that happened at night. You know the sort of thing. It’s dark and cloudy and maybe there’s a storm trembling in the air and you’re lost in the middle of the countryside and suddenly, somewhere a wolf howls…
By the time I was 14 I’d read all of Darren Shan and I’d even started on Stephen King although my mum didn’t like that because of all the rude words. The sort of horror stories I liked best had ghosts and vampires and hideous monsters that jumped out at you when you weren’t expecting them. I once saw a film about a man being chased by cannibals and I swear I didn’t sleep for a week.
But as I discovered, real horror isn’t like that.
Real horror is worse.
For me, it all started on a beautiful September afternoon. It was the end of our first week at school and I was walking home down streets that I’d known all my life. I remember hearing the chimes of an ice cream van. A bunch of little kids ran past me, chasing after it. There were a couple of workmen painting one of the houses and one of them raised a hand in greeting as I walked past. I other words, everything was normal. It was so normal that I didn’t even notice it how normal it was, if you know what I mean.
No. That’s not quite true.
There was one thing.
I live with my mum and dad in a sort of crescent. All the houses are modern and to look at them you’d think they were all competing to have the prettiest front gardens. We’re right in the middle and as I approached the front door, I noticed a crow, perched on the roof. It would have been hard to miss. It was a great, fat thing, almost twice the size of any bird I’d ever seen. And it was black. It’s feathers could have been dipped in oil, the way they hung off. It’s eyes - also black - were as bright as diamonds.
There was something pink and nasty, writhing in it’s beak. The crow was eating it. But as I approached, it stopped and for a moment it seemed to stare right at me. I don’t know how long I stood there, looking at it - probably just two or three seconds, although it felt longer. Then, acting on impulse, I leaned down, picked up a stick and threw it at the crow.
“Shoo!” I shouted. “Buzz off!” The crow lurched into the sky and disappeared. And that was it. It was just a bird, eating a worm and I thought I had scared it away. That was what I thought.
I’d already forgotten about it as I fumbled for the keys and opened the front door. As usual, I threw my nag down in the hall and went straight into the kitchen. But nothing was ever going to be “as usual” again. I smelled it first. Sweet and sickening.
And then I saw it.

What happens next?

The end (By Alex Plumb)
The scene of both parents lying on kitchen floor, blood oozing out from them onto the tiled surface, was like a wall slamming into me and I involuntarily took two steps back. On the double take, I wanted to yell, bawl, moan, but my breath recoiled into my lungs and refused to leave.
Raw emotion flooded me and I ran over quietly sobbing. My mum was face down, my dad on his back, his hand clutching a brass fire poker. I scrunched down on my knees to shake mum, but it was no use. Had they fought? Why? My mind was racing. I kind of already knew I was an orphan but it was only weeks later that I accepted I was the sole surviving member of my family.
Mum was deteriorating fast, both were - almost melting. A virus? MRSA? Surely that only happened in hospitals? And could any bug be this super? Both the wounds were festering disgustingly and the smell was getting worse. A flicker caught the corner of my eye. Through tear-stained vision, I looked up and then I saw the broken window.
Our house backed onto a field and beyond it were marshes, but no-one went near there. Barbed wire running through it cordoned off the government-run animal research labs on the other side of the marshes and that was where the distant fire was coming from.
The virus must have escaped, I reckoned. Were the flames destroying it or spreading it? Then the crow filled my sight, landing on the jagged glass rim, still with that wretched worm in its beak. But it wasn’t a worm - close up, I now saw it was a finger, not wriggling but rapidly decomposing. I looked down - my mother’s little finger. The crow tipped its head back, gobbling it up. Then it barked, loudly, imperiously at me. A dull throbbing started upstairs. Something had awakened.
I climbed the stairs with trepidation. I had to find out the mystery, but my fear was only narrowly trumped by my goading curiosity. My tears burned on my cheeks. My bedroom door was open as usual and the banal thrumming emanated from there.
Unable to draw it out any longer, I rushed into the doorway and was struck with pure terror. A huge fly-mosquito thing was hovering in my bedroom, it’s tendril legs twitching, it’s globular eyes fixating on me, the wings not whining, but chopping the air. It was the size of an Alsatian dog. Was this some nightmarish revenge for all those flies I swatted? Researchers had just bred some super stamina mice, but who would create this? I was petrified. I was going to die.
Then the crow flew in behind me, it’s wingtips clattering my head, breaking the spell. It, however, was most alarmed at this role reversal of predator and prey. Scientists would call it a proboscis, I call it a large javelin. It shot out from the monster - and speared the crow.
I jerked back and slammed the door. The crow had saved my life but I wasn’t safe. My window was a single pane like the one in the kitchen. It could still escape. I jumped down the stairs, four at a time. My door was being thumped against. I dashed into the kitchen, knocked on all of the gas hobs and struck a match to light one. I desperately ran out of the house, tripping on my satchel - that felt like bursting my heart.
Back out in the normality I felt like I’d entered a new world. I dragged myself out the front fence gate and, with dread draining right through me, looked up towards my bedroom. It’s face loomed at the window. It was still coming for me. Please, please, please, oh please, no! That stick, which I had thrown at the crow; it had bounced off the side of the house and landed in one of my mum’s prize bushes. I snatched it and hurled it at that despicable creature. The pane fractured and it spun away.
Flames were licking the side of the house and the kids, licking their ice creams, had come over to see what the fuss was about. “Go away,” I shouted like a madman. “Just get, get away.” My voice was cracking, my tear ducts broke again. They stared at me baffled. I shoved them back and turned round to see the edifice - the centre of my life - consumed in scorching red tongues.
My heart ached from beating so frantically, but it wasn’t over yet. And then, I heard it, everyone did. A hysterical high pitch staccato shriek, like a fast-motion ratchet rending the air - the scream of the unnatural, the death of something which never should have been born.

Explanation
This was for a writing competition in The Guardian, at the back of its Saturday Comic supplement. Author Anthony Horowitz had supplied the beginning of a horror story (with Halloween a few days away, this newspaper edition being 27th October) and the reader had to complete it in no more than 800 words. Mine is 799. The first prize was a £50 book token, ten Anthony Horowitz novels and the work in print, the latter the most important to me. Two runners-up would get a £25 book token and a set of Horowitz’s novels, their work too published (albeit implied only on the Guardian website). The winner would have the scariest and most original story, one picked by Horowitz from a long-list compiled by Becky Gardiner, editor of the Comic.
The entry had to be submitted by midnight November 7th 2007, a Wednesday. So on the Tuesday, I thought up the scenario. I wrote down my ideas on a piece of notepaper and just as I was going to set them into type, I read the rules more thoroughly. The competition was open to children living in the UK, aged seven to 16. That rather undercut what I was about to do.
Still, I had gone to such lengths imagining it, I was not going to just forget about it. So I have typed it up now (10th November 2007). The website is to be found at: www.guardian.co.uk/family/comic. It said it would tell those who had won by November 21st.
Horowitz had specified to avoid blood and guts, the scariest things being in the imagination. Other tips said that something horrible was in the house and also this was on a bright, sunny day, taking place in what had been the normalcy of life. I opted for some science gone wrong , taking it away from ghouls and goblins, as Horowitz seemed to be steering away from the latter in his opening. This was appropriate since it was in the aftermath of the foot-and-mouth virus escaping from government laboratories in the late summer and American scientists had just bred, only days before I put my brain into action, a type of ‘mighty mouse’. The faraway fire at the labs suggests a bad incident has occurred, without exactly stating what. Previously, I had imagined what horror would be in the house, what scared most people, first alighting on putting a huge spider in it, then deciding a monstrous fly-mosquito thingy would give more possibilities to work with. My view is that the insect and the crow (because the crow is very big) both got loose somehow and the scientists were using the marshes in some nefarious way, possibly to create the insect over there.
I was not impressed by Horowitz’s “it was just a normal day” scenario, finding that a bit hackneyed in itself, but I set to the task in hand. I throw in a few red herrings, the protagonist at first thinking his parents had killed each other, then it was a superbug virus. I envisage the insect smashing through the kitchen window, killing the mother from behind. The father reacts, grabs a fire poker and as he attacks the monster, he too is killed, hence why she is on her front, he on his back. I was going to throw in a little aside about the protagonist and the mother earlier protesting about energy efficiency, but the father standing firm in believing the single pane window to be quaint and so he died for being energy inefficient. In the end, however, I felt it to be a distraction.
I thought in an androgynous way so as to appeal to both genders reading, that they can identify more readily with the protagonist - I imagined her more as a girl than a boy to offset my masculine preferences. For a child, the ultimate sanctuary is the bedroom, so this is where the monster lurks. I thought it fitting, that the crow, which so heartlessly eats the dead mother’s finger, itself is made into food and, ironically, saves the protagonist’s life. The story also reflects on an untrustworthy and reckless government, which destroys the family and the home of the protagonist by meddling in things which it should not and then being unable to control them.

Amsterdam Stag Weekend

It's been over two weeks since my last entry, but preparation for the wedding and a full weekday schedule of work means I really haven't had the time to update the blog. Part of that marriage preparation was the Stag Weekend I enjoyed in Amsterdam last week. Knowing the code of what goes on tour, stays on tour, I shall divulge the savoury aspects.
First of all, it was glorious weather - ideal for a foreign jaunt, as the sun makes everything look better, the perfect setting. On the Friday we hit the Anne Frank museum - a moving experience - relaxed with beers on a bridge over one of the many canals, had a Mexican meal (my slices of beef were marinated in cactus and Mexican sauce) and wandered through the red light district. This took window shopping to new heights (or depths) of meaning, as we passed by scantily clad prostitutes displaying themselves for interested punters. Personally, though there were a few beautiful ones, it was rather like being in a butcher's shop with slabs of meat hung on hooks in terms of eroticism. We went to a club in that area and after a little bit more walking (we did a lot of that), the others went home and Jon and I took one of the group to the central station (he had to catch a flight back to see Crystal Palace in a play-off match - given the result, he probably wish he had stayed in Amsterdam). Jon and I talked about this woman on the night bus we caught back to our hostel. We got off a stop too early by mistake and a minute or so later, the woman walked in our direction "Hi boys," she called out. She was, in fact, Scottish and had understood everything we had said. She took it in her stride though and gave us directions home. As we needed to make a decision on which way to turn after advancing a bit, there was a young English woman who pointed the way. these fellow Brits were very well placed.
On getting into the hostel we found the other group who had left England late had arrived and taken our beds, so we went into the other room we had hired. We were so tired we were beyond caring.
On the Saturday, somehow most of us stumbled out of bed for breakfast, of which the croissant was the most edible. Simon Savory was a bit of bed bug, steadfastly ensconced in eiderdown, until told by me realyed, by Chris Brown that the bottle of whiskey had been polished off, at which point he sat bolt upright in bed ans satrted accusing his fellow travellers, despite Alex Goff telling Simon that it was the latter who had done the polishing. Exploring Amsterdam again, we ran into this pro-China rally, organised on the pretext of supporting the Olympic Games. There was the usual sign explaining what BBC and CNN stood for, as favoured by each overwhelmingly powerful culture or clique, that feels persecuted when it persecutes others and is shown to do so. The guys in the giant Olympic rubber suits that were the cute symbols China has designated as Olympic symbols must have been dying in their own sweat. Maybe all that muffling had a positive effect, as the crowd were treated to an ear-splitting, cloying song called "Friends Forever," which was delivered by tone-deaf Chinese singers. What was most odd was that there were no pro-Tibet or any protestors and posters in restuarant windows showed the event had been well flagged.
Reaching another canal near the Anne Frank museum, we decided to indulge in a spot of pedalo wars. We pedalled along the waterways of Amsterdam, avoiding huge tourist boats with, at least in the pedalo I was in, consummate ease. Others sometimes ending up going backwards. Eventually, we reached our destination, the Heineken brewery, but as we figured earlier it was closed, so we moseyed on over to a nearby bar where we had more beers and I had a huge strawberry pancake with whipped cream. I can still taste it. We headed back to the centre of Amstersdam and went into the sex museum. I wouldn't say it was an eye-opener, but there were some pretty weird acts being depicted, notably one involving a woman and two octupuses (being a Japanese drawing, the obvious pun of octopussy was avoided as its title). One of the Marilyn Monroes from the Seven Year Itch display had been removed for, ahem, maintenance, but other sections showed her development as a sex icon. The Dutch called that film Seven Years of Reflection which doesn't quite capture its essence. As night closed in, we returned to the red light district and entered another club, which was a good deal of fun.
On Sunday, the late arrivers left first to begin their long drive back through Holland, Belgium and France. The rest of us went off to a pancake place and the headed to the famous old bridge of Amsterdam and even saw it in working operation to let a boat pass under it. then we went back to the airport and getting on the plane travelled back in time, leaving Schipol airport at 17.20 and landing at Heathrow at 17.15. As the jolly pilot said we had left the Netherlands expeditiously. As for the weather, "that's easy - the same as the Netherlands; warm and sunny," according to our happy air captain. What a wonderful weekend.

Friday, May 02, 2008

Londoners selling themselves down the river (Thames)

It's been a very destructive night for the Labour party and that sentiment might even take down Ken Livingstone, which is ironic given the lack of love lost between him and Gordon Brown. Charlie Brooker compared electing Boris Johnson to making Frank Spencer out of Some Mothers Do 'Ave 'Em, but it's not entirely accurate. It's more like the Simpsons episode Sideshow Bob Roberts, where Sideshow Bob ejects the likeable but incompetent incumbent Mayor Quimby from office by a landslide and threatens the Simpson family. Bart and Lisa expose Sideshow Bob as having cheated, who even took names from the pet cemetery to add to the electoral role, after a tip-off from Waylan Smithers whose, ahem, lifestyle choices, clashed with Sideshow Bob's ultra-conservative views. But Sideshow Bob was also quite popular and we can only hope that, given a Johnson victory is almost certain, he is revealed as letting the animals in his hair vote as well. I was thinking last night that Johnson was going to win, despite all the credible arguments against him. Now, I'm even more certain.

Altaa's here!

It's been a while since my last post as I have been very busy. Last Friday Altaa finally arrived in the UK and the Monday before that I started my new job in telesales which is eight hours a day in the middle of the day and all the time outside of that has been either preparing for Altaa, being with her or preparing for the wedding. So it's been a while.
Two weekends ago, I went to London for a house party at Mel's in Bethnal Green, but before I met up with Harry in central London and we toodles around. I went to Lynsey's house first and a group of us made our way to Mel's gold- and silver-themed house party at Norton House. It's not as pretty as her previous pad in Docklands, but homely. I stayed the night and on Sunday met up with Jon near Crouch End in Weston Park.
I picked Altaa up at Heathrow Airport terminal three. It took her roughly an hour and a half from her plane touching down to her walking onto truly British soil at half past seven. After standing up so long I went to sit back down again just as she was coming through the gate, but she saw me and came to find me.
Now we have spent so much time together and I have given her tours of Gillingham, chatham and Rochester. She likes how green it is. And we are happy.