Wife trouble
The
recently analysed 4th Century Coptic Script that Harvard Professor
Karen King believes says that Jesus Christ was married and to Mary is hardly
definitive proof that he was. Those words,
written in a language used by ancient Egyptian Christians, translate to “Jesus
said to them, my wife,” King said. Ms
King pontificated further that, in the dialogue, the disciples discuss whether
Mary is worthy and Jesus says “she can be my disciple.”
Given
that it a fragment rather than a complete tome, one has to take with a pinch of
salt that this means Mary, presumably Magdalene, was Jesus’ wife. He could be alluding to a metaphorical wife –
when He talked of seed and sheep, He wasn’t being literal! Moreover, could this ‘Mary’ be unrelated to
the wife exegesis and indeed refer to his mother, with whom He was very firm at
the wedding at Cana, to which His mother apparently had no problems – a very
willing disciple of her son.
This
is similar to the far less contentious (outside Roman Catholic circles) issue
of whether Jesus had biological brothers or whether His camaraderie with His
disciples meant that the ‘brothers’ mentioned were The Twelve. Indeed, it is raised in non-RC churches
merely as an interesting intellectual diversion.
Even
if the connections made by modern scholars are representative of the words, it
could be that this was a group of Christians who had their own ideas about
theology and who could not conceive of Jesus not marrying. That doesn’t make it so. 400 years after The Passion, the earliest
known portrait of Jesus has Him as blond and clean-shaven, though this is highly
unlikely of a person who grew up in that part of the world. This fragment dates from the same era. Many interpretations of the life of Jesus
have abounded throughout history, Mormonism being the most popular of the recent
divergences from the mainstream.
I
don’t doubt the authenticity of the scrawl, but there are so many questions
about it that it is far from being conclusive on anything. It is bait for conspiracy theorists and dusty
antiquarians and few others.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home