Out of Africa, into the Orient, then over and out
The shocking investigation by Panorama last night brings a
pretty strong case that all ivory sales should be banned from sale again and is
an influential campaigning tool when the Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species (CITES) meets to discuss applications for relaxing the ban
further. The ‘one-off’ sale in 2008 of
African ivory to China and Japan has
rekindled an addiction which is as insatiable as it is destructive. Although African countries can trade on their
internal markets, smugglers from the Far East
can mingle easily with the Chinese entrepreneurs surging through the
sub-Saharan nations. The ebony hearts of
the poachers in their quest for ivory show no regard for sustainability. Chinese shops are supposed to be rigorously regulated
but as Panorama showed, even state department stores do not follow protocol
(which should invalidate the CITES settlement, bringing back a full ban).
There
were some interesting facts revealed, such as the Chinese name for ivory
translates as ‘elephant teeth’, contributing to lowered concern among the
general population about how ivory is obtained.
Carvers on occasion resort to using the tusks of woolly mammoths dug out
of frozen Siberian tundra but possessions made from these are viewed as less
valuable in the Chinese market. Also,
though the African elephant is lumped as one, the jungle pachyderm is as
different from its savannah brethren as lions are from tigers. Yet because of their remote locations - reducing
income from tourists - the jungle elephants are most at risk of extinction. Mankind’s record on preserving species is
generally lamentable, as man’s demands are infinite on the Earth’s finite
resources. As far back as Roman times,
the Anatolian lion was hunted out of existence to entertain the blood sports at
arenas and who feels sympathy for these long-gone beasts now? Education among buyers is too slow and
selling tusks will make little dent in overall African poverty. The ban should be extended once again.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home