To Kick It Out kick Terry out
While the furore rages whether John Terry should go to the
European Championships, now that his trial for race hate has been postponed to
July, no-one questions the motives of his club Chelsea. After all, they are the ones who have
requested the delay because it might affect their players i.e. they might have
to sacrifice a few hours away from the Playstation or Xbox to attend court. It is a risible excuse. Tottenham Hotspur manage to soldier on. The
true reason is Chelsea’s cynicism, seeking to manipulate the legal process, for
if John Terry was convicted his football career would be over – he certainly
could not continue to be club captain – and this would damage Chelsea as they
desperately strive to stay in contention for Champions League qualification for
next season. Whether Terry’s name is
ultimately cleared or not, let alone justice taking its course is not important
to the Stamford Bridge hierarchy and I do find their contempt for the
anti-racist cause and indeed that of the English national team sickening. Say England were to triumph in Poland and the
Ukraine and then the person who led the team was convicted of race hate, it
would taint the whole achievement.
Of course, John Terry has to stand down as captain for a
second time. Innocent until proven
guilty maybe but life isn’t fair and previous indiscretions have long exhausted
any reservoir of goodwill. This would
really send a signal that racism will not be tolerated anywhere, even on the
previous ‘sanctuary of the pitch’. Maybe
Terry should direct some of his ire at his employers for dragging it out. In no other profession could a person of
standing be allowed to continue in post – they would be suspended on full pay,
with another employee standing in the breach until the charges were resolved
one way or another. Spurs are a special
case because no-one could fill the manager’s role adequately. Politicians are accused of a litany of
misdemeanours, but if Chris Huhne is put on the path to prosecution by the
police tomorrow, then he has to abdicate his responsibilities until the matter
is settled. If he did get his wife to
take speeding points on his behalf, he has broken the law (incidentally, so has
she; talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face).
I remember that a defence counsel recounted in a newspaper
interview that he often had clients who liked to dress in a brassy suit and
tie, in the manner of their idol John Terry dressing for formal occasions. This suited-and-booted swagger instantly
alienated the jury and made a conviction more likely. Instead, the lawyer tried to convince the
client to appear in their normal clothes to show humility and the kind of personal
background they come from. I fear come
July he is going to have to become a lot more persuasive.
Notwithstanding the charges, there is an argument that Terry
shouldn’t go to the Euros in a professional capacity. No-one disputes that he has put his body on
the line over the years and played through the pain barrier, but this attrition
has dulled his physical capabilities. He
was part of a defensive team that was repeatedly cut apart by the German’s
Young Turks (a description befitting in more ways than one) at the World Cup. That was in 2010. Who’s to say, two years on, the same won’t
happen, if not worse? With the voices of
Jason Roberts and Piarra Power saying his presence would be toxic in the
dressing room, that is the most powerful of indictments and, all in all, it
seems folly to stick with Terry. Fabio
Capello and the FA have to act.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home